Tofu, or not Tofu
One of my more popular open source fonts is Adobe Blank, and to a less extent the related Adobe Blank 2 because it uses a 'cmap' table format, Format 13, that is not broadly supported. Actually, Adobe Blank provides absolutely nothing, because it maps all 1,111,998 Unicode code points to a range of 2,048 non-spacing and non-marking glyphs, yet such a font is useful for particular scenarios, such as addressing the FOUT (Flash Of Unstyled Text) problem.
Allow me to introduce Adobe NotDef, which is modeled after Adobe Blank in that it covers all of Unicode and maps to a range of 2,048 glyphs, but differs in that the functional glyphs are spacing and marking. The original suggestion for Adobe NotDef came from Dave Crossland. The glyphs match the shape and advance width of the standard Adobe .notdef glyph that is invoked in environments that do not support font fallback when the selected font does not include a glyph for a particular character, and as Dave wrote, Adobe NotDef is useful for font fallback purposes in that it can be used to prevent the display of non-standard .notdef glyphs that may be present in some fonts in the font fallback chain.
All 2,048 functional glyphs in Adobe Blank specify the following short charstring that represents a zero-unit horizontal advance with no subpaths:
On the other hand, all 2,048 functional glyphs in Adobe NotDef, along with the .notdef glyph itself (CID+0), specify the following charstring that represents a 1000-unit horizontal advance with five subpaths:
100-120 move 900-120 line 900 880 line 100 880 line
500 421 move 182 830 line 818 830 line
532 380 move 850 789 line 850-29 line
182-70 move 500 339 line 818-70 line
150 789 move 468 380 line 150-29 line
Thanks to subroutinization, there is little or no bloat in the CFF for these 2,048 glyphs. In fact, Adobe Blank and Adobe NotDef are approximately 20K in size, and differ in size by less than 2K.
The Introducing Adobe Blank and Adobe Blank Redux blog articles provide some background about the Unicode coverage and the reason why 2,048 functional glyphs are included, so I won't repeat the details here.
There is a bit of history about the .notdef glyph that is used for Adobe NotDef. Prior to the deployment of OpenType/CFF fonts, Adobe Type 1 fonts, to include its CJK ones, used a spacing and non-marking .notdef glyph. In order to make more explicit the presence of characters for which the selected font lacks a glyph, a marking and obvious .notdef glyph was designed and employed. The .notdef glyph used in Adobe NotDef has been included in Adobe's OpenType/CFF fonts from their very early releases, and my own notes suggest that this goes back as far as 1998.
Edited on 2016-05-24to add that my long time manager, David Lemon, is the person who originally designed this glyph, which was meant to convey a clearer "glyph not available" message than a blank or tofu-like shape.
Anyway, enjoy Adobe NotDef!
- ·Surabaya Beat by Beat Presser, Afterhours Books
- ·How to sell your typefaces
- ·Jim Nutt: Coming Into Character at Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago
- ·Amazon Releases Ember Bold Font for the Kindle
- ·The Future of Sex poster
- ·Iconic Transport for London logo undergoes subtle redesign
- ·"Jesus Music" ad for Myrrh Records
- ·"Fantastic!" ad for Captain Fantastic & the Brown Dirt Cowboy by Elton John & Bernie Taupin
- ·How House Industries Designs Its Retrotastic Logos and Typefaces
- ·Fonts Design of Childhood Memory
游客's review on Article 免费商用中文字体有哪些？注意下，新蒂字体已不能商用。
游客's review on Article 超强视觉冲击-3D字体设计作品超强视觉冲击
游客's review on Article 20个出色的艺术字体设计作品欣赏优秀作品展
游客's review on Article 全球第一家手书数字化平台-在线书写毛笔字生成TTF字体给你全世界智慧
馬塞客's review on Article 字体疑问？1.可能是版权问题故意的。（体验版） 2、可能是字库制作时疏忽bug。
游客's review on Article 自己动手用FontCreator修改字体简单教程因为这是日本的字体，所以缺字很正常，字型的编排也是按照日本教育部标准做的。